From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16875: python, comint-mode: Large output makes Emacs freeze Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 06:20:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <530C60A7.1030009@easy-emacs.de> <871tt7levi.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1406456488 2674 80.91.229.3 (27 Jul 2014 10:21:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 10:21:28 +0000 (UTC) To: 16875@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 27 12:21:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XBLZw-00046S-DD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:21:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34458 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBLZw-0000Xl-08 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 06:21:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBLZl-0000Wo-QC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 06:21:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBLZe-00037Y-6S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 06:21:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XBLZe-00037U-3u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 06:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XBLZd-0008N5-Lw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 06:21:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 10:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16875 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16875-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16875.140645644432147 (code B ref 16875); Sun, 27 Jul 2014 10:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16875) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Jul 2014 10:20:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39189 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XBLZM-0008MQ-0Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 06:20:44 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-pri-02-2.vtxnet.net ([212.147.62.156]:53398 helo=smtp-pri-02.vtxnet.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XBLZI-0008MH-LX for 16875@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 06:20:41 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (dyn.83-228-141-040.dsl.vtx.ch [83.228.141.40]) by smtp-pri-02.vtxnet.net (VTX Services SA) with ESMTP id A7F3037DCA9; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 12:20:39 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7428EAE1BC; Sun, 27 Jul 2014 06:20:39 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871tt7levi.fsf@gnu.org> ("=?UTF-8?Q?Fabi=C3=A1n?= Ezequiel Gallina"'s message of "Sat, 26 Jul 2014 23:22:41 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91843 Archived-At: > Emacs is still slow, but at least responds to commands. I feel that > everything that could be optimized on the comint side is pretty much > there and that the slowness being experienced is in fact related to the > long-lines slowness bug mentioned before[0]. Have you tried to ensure that font-lock is only applied once a line is complete (i.e. after seeing the corresponding \n)? Stefan