From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What's up with apply-partially? Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:01:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <874mrh5emp.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1422075696 6760 80.91.229.3 (24 Jan 2015 05:01:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 05:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Kastrup , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 24 06:01:35 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YEsqi-0000h7-MI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 06:01:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34015 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEsqh-00088h-QA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:01:31 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEsqV-00088Z-Ix for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:01:20 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEsqS-0004Jv-FE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:01:19 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:40438) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YEsqS-0004Jp-AD; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:01:16 -0500 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t0O51CgM026446; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:01:13 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B39AA66100; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:01:07 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Sat, 24 Jan 2015 11:05:11 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV5195=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5195> : inlines <1940> : streams <1378468> : uri <1843586> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:181715 Archived-At: > I have been wondering this myself. I wonder if it was a workaround from > the time when lexical-binding was not activated in subr.el? Yes, I think this is the explanation. Feel free to change it, Stefan