From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tags-loop-continue Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:12:54 -0500 Message-ID: References: <83wprimto9.fsf@gnu.org> <56916C10.6050004@yandex.ru> <83oacumqmj.fsf@gnu.org> <56917246.1010800@yandex.ru> <5691795E.9010008@yandex.ru> <83lh7ym725.fsf@gnu.org> <5691D768.3020908@yandex.ru> <83bn8tmnvq.fsf@gnu.org> <56928356.2000609@yandex.ru> <8360z1mkfc.fsf@gnu.org> <5696EE9D.2090708@yandex.ru> <838u3si22k.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453072536 20583 80.91.229.3 (17 Jan 2016 23:15:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 23:15:36 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 18 00:15:27 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aKwXc-0004Qc-CT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:15:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56202 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aKwXb-0002HE-DJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:15:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54600) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aKwXO-0002H1-Es for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:15:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aKwXJ-0007kj-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:45772) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aKwXJ-0007kf-49 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jan 2016 18:15:05 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aKwXH-00045Q-Td for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:15:04 +0100 Original-Received: from 23-91-143-239.cpe.pppoe.ca ([23.91.143.239]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:15:03 +0100 Original-Received: from monnier by 23-91-143-239.cpe.pppoe.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2016 00:15:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 23-91-143-239.cpe.pppoe.ca User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:i6a2J1CS/S9IwHDZrcoYW44gAwU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198221 Archived-At: > Unfortunately, I think it makes much more sense to bind > tags-loop-continue back to 'M-,', and bind xref-pop-marker-stack to > 'M-*', the old binding of pop-tag-mark, which xref-pop-marker-stack > replaces. When tags-loop-continue is no longer needed, we could use > its binding for xref-pop-marker-stack, but until then we cannot use > its key for an entirely different command, I think. Would it be possible to bind M-, to a new command which dispatches either to tags-loop-continue or to xref-pop-marker-stack? IOW is there some way to guess reliably which one makes sense? Stefan "not familiar with these uses of tags-loop-continue"