From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Flymake refactored Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:37:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87h8vmj3tr.fsf@lolita> <1507138648.1972.0@smtp.gmail.com> <874lre2von.fsf@gmail.com> <87mv566yjx.fsf@udel.edu> <87shex276r.fsf@gmail.com> <87efqh2sud.fsf@udel.edu> <877ew919hd.fsf@gmail.com> <87tvzb1nae.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507383632 2967 195.159.176.226 (7 Oct 2017 13:40:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 13:40:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 07 15:40:27 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0pL7-0008Jb-Lt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 15:40:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49815 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0pLE-0007sK-L8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:40:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60599) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0pL8-0007sF-Dv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:40:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0pL3-0000bf-I9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:40:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=49032 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0pL3-0000ak-9R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:40:21 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0pKo-0006Iv-IJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 15:40:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:xe9j5yWR2uTA2LaBMlOG9qIp2Zo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219219 Archived-At: >> Similarly the LaTeX backend would naturally fit in tex-mode.el. > Please no. What about AUCTeX users? AUCTeX can (require 'tex-mode) and then use that function. AUCTeX and tex-mode should share more code anyway (IIUC they already share font-lock rules, at least to the extent that you can use tex-mode font-lock rules in AUCTeX, tho AUCTeX also comes with its own font-lock rules that you can use instead). Stefan