From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Merge-base alias for git vc-diff Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:22:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87bm58ornb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <92f058a4-ef98-725b-9603-5a671113dfaa@yandex.ru> <87lg4aak10.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87o98zapae.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <7e8020d6-92df-a475-cbd7-98f42676a99b@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1546485667 11222 195.159.176.226 (3 Jan 2019 03:21:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 03:21:07 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel , Dmitry Gutov To: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 03 04:21:03 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1getZ8-0002pJ-KY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2019 04:21:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48815 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1getbF-0006ZJ-CY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:23:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60812) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1getb9-0006XV-BX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:23:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1getb5-0008Nj-QG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:23:07 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:58621) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1getb5-0008JD-9q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:23:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x033Mxgd012038; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 22:23:00 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4FE54AE35F; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 22:22:59 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1vora=22's?= message of "Wed, 2 Jan 2019 22:48:10 +0000") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6452=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6452> : inlines <6990> : streams <1808969> : uri <2773959> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:232124 Archived-At: > That depends on how one uses Emacs. I personally prefer hints, > completion and C-u modifiers to new commands. So do I. Especially since we'd then also have to add new log-view-merge-diff commands and possibly others. >> Isn't minibuffer normally just one line tall? > Don't know. Is there a hard rule against printing more lines? > Or a real disadvantage? FWIW, my minibuffer has 1 line and can't grow because it's in a minibuffer-only frame. Stefan