From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#35044) Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 18:47:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20190501005253.12791.10999@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190501005255.2DF9B2042B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="38908"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 04 00:50:44 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hMh0t-0009t3-CB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 00:50:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48149 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMh0s-000707-90 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 18:50:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44601) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMh0I-000701-9D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 18:50:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMh0H-0000QG-EJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 18:50:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=60848 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hMh0H-0000PZ-3s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 May 2019 18:50:05 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hMh0E-0008mh-F0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 May 2019 00:50:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Cancel-Lock: sha1:uAWwMR3H4vKoGvHiy7Y4oZgjMQg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236135 Archived-At: >> > * doc/lispref/processes.texi (Filter Functions): Use >> > insert-before-markers in the "ordinary" filter example, like >> > internal-default-process-filter does. >> >> In my experience, insert-before-markers is a source of problems down the >> road, so I'd recommend not to encourage its use by showing it in example >> code where it's not strictly needed. > > But it's an example about "mimicking the actions of the default > filter" which does currently use insert-before-markers. But do we really want to mimic that undesirable part of the behavior? Stefan