all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: "Mattias Engdegård" <mattiase@acm.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: master ea93326: Add `union' and `intersection' to rx (bug#37849)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 10:10:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwvfthqyk4q.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A7D4DC03-5CC3-4DEC-9328-4C96BFB97DD2@acm.org> ("Mattias \=\?windows-1252\?Q\?Engdeg\=E5rd\=22's\?\= message of "Wed, 11 Dec 2019 12:17:25 +0100")

>> Why not (re)use `or` instead of `union`?  IOW make it an optimization?
> It probably could, but having to explain the restrictions to the user felt
> a bit messy, so I went with a neatly closed collection of set operations
> (union, intersection and complement).

But as a user now I wonder what's the difference between `or` and
`union` and also why there has to be a difference.


        Stefan




  reply	other threads:[~2019-12-11 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20191210213842.5388.30110@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
     [not found] ` <20191210213843.EB6A520A23@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
2019-12-10 21:52   ` master ea93326: Add `union' and `intersection' to rx (bug#37849) Stefan Monnier
2019-12-11 11:17     ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-12-11 15:10       ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2019-12-12 22:48         ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-12-13 13:55           ` Stefan Monnier
2019-12-13 17:03             ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-12-13 17:13               ` Stefan Monnier
2019-12-13 17:43                 ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-12-13 23:03                   ` Stefan Monnier
2019-12-15 11:08                     ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-12-15 14:53                       ` Stefan Monnier
2019-12-15 19:23                         ` Mattias Engdegård
2019-12-15 20:04                           ` Stefan Monnier
2019-12-15 20:42                             ` Stefan Monnier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jwvfthqyk4q.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org \
    --to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=mattiase@acm.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.