From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:38:45 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86tv2h2vww.fsf@gmail.com> <20200322123818.GB32470@ACM> <87eetk5swm.fsf@gnu.org> <20200326193128.GC14092@ACM> <86d08y4zsx.fsf@gmail.com> <83sghs7qdz.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7y63sjj.fsf@gnu.org> <834ku43c61.fsf@gnu.org> <83k12zz6ds.fsf@gnu.org> <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="60270"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: acm@muc.de, eliz@gnu.org, rrandresf@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 03 15:39:27 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jKMXe-000Fah-O2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:39:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55604 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKMXd-0006E4-Nh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:39:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34699) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jKMXB-0005o9-3y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:38:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKMX9-0003dZ-Px for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:38:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:59832) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jKMX8-0003ct-HD; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:38:54 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B1A2C44F8A5; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 09:38:53 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 585FC44F579; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 09:38:52 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1585921132; bh=spHEXvKq9PkNyaQ4qvz65OZ0yljANDLDPrwUqI6/oaE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=SxlbSqpiRQrfgbvrn0IBxnvIBhfe3fbCOlZ2eehNU0ug2BZViM7PEqGLVo6cEiPpo YsNefuIb3X31BAwFwHSMrdm6SwqknHj9le4RxrRfTj+kJRg8UY7kNkgsoAW3/qXOVM 5l4sxWqV9ix0DnzxdTH6t3CnyvubkZiPt2xgLe3/PsdFCVeqHwWq/HKe+AxWL6PhXY 3p1AdvHr7M7DCbyhn4slWRjZ/RbjFsNuJV6UEbQ/0V15hCumt013arDIu5qZyayVtk gAMACdZbzz+QOJ5ORvZuQGIlBVXKNScWIj3JT65I9yPBEB/NTkR9sxLrHJVt7VKTfe zd7sbb0gNVk9Q== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [104.247.241.114]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD5E312038D; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 09:38:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <054393f3-3873-ab6e-b325-0eca354d8838@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:59:54 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:246326 Archived-At: > The basic slowness of Emacs over the past years is a direct consequence > of that policy. Do you have some kind of (concrete, statistical, circumstantial, ...) evidence for that? Stefan "whose fastest machine has an Intel i3-4170"