From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master cfcf42f 2/2: Ensure that gud commands for non-GDB debuggers are handled by repeat-mode Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:08:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20210727211521.15408.98852@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210727211523.AE6F72065F@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <877dhabg5s.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgu6h0e1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a6m6tn0e.fsf@gnus.org> <87r1figz3p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87zgu4ri8b.fsf@gnus.org> <837dh8s6fj.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1ffit6k.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26281"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen , leungbk@mailfence.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 31 00:08:43 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1m9agM-0006fl-S5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 00:08:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50364 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9agL-0008U0-Py for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:08:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38200) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9afp-0007nk-2S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:08:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:64901) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1m9afm-0004nJ-Os; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:08:07 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 96C1E100221; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:08:04 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4551A1001E8; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:08:03 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1627682883; bh=nlQ9vO+wrNoi0cOXzyxUwtCoyen0MWYyXKRi86Fc5XA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=bEB5ePUwROHQ6IW/YtPlvKlctJiYTrNJXrR05Ft24vCFWu6svkpgpMktAndn3201M GxAzREp087bAwgesO7V8hfGGNetWpf4oy50psHfLldzUJZ/Lk1XLSBH9jEXVxLfqUE T7sgVQeF1IPzeMYJQxyKMolRyi67m3T874WCJR3gusdC+w1t7Swtf00OnG71K+d9+b 0WoSrLnn4oabpUfr6rT02rOdovPjkFb5XseE5GA/FpW8J57DA7L+JgTvY5fRypV7hF C2vC+dph68e0nzKIEoziN5C90OgxTWeM2FoOgqtOjD7YOId1BBdyknH97hIs5CFy/6 JBvAoXO4QTE1w== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.29.138]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 083D212058B; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 18:08:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87r1ffit6k.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Fri, 30 Jul 2021 20:54:11 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:271880 Archived-At: Juri Linkov [2021-07-30 20:54:11] wrote: > For example, today's compilation displayed as lot of such lines: > > Warning: Eager macro-expansion skipped due to cycle: > =E2=80=A6 =3D> (load "byte-opt.el") =3D> (macroexpand-all =E2=80=A6 > Warning: Eager macro-expansion skipped due to cycle: > =E2=80=A6 =3D> (load "byte-opt.el") =3D> (macroexpand-all =E2=80=A6 > =E2=80=A6 These usually reflect bugs, but we can't conveniently pin them on a particular file (they're usually due to a cycle between macros and functions in several files), so I don't think using the standard ":" syntax for warnings would be all that useful, but it wouldn't make things worse either, so a ":0:" prefix sounds like a good idea (where would presumably be the file we're eagerly macroexpanding). Sometimes they're highly dependent on specific ordering of compilation of files, but if you can reproduce them reliably, then please report them so we can try and fix them. Stefan