bug#62746: [PATCH] Updated Elispref-Manual: `nil' cannot be defuned

[Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>]

>> >> “The symbols nil and void are Lisp objects, and can be stored into a
>> >>  function cell just as any other object can be (and they can be valid
>> >>  functions if you define them in turn with defun).”
>> >> 
>> >> Updated:
>> >> 
>> >> “The symbols nil and void are Lisp objects, and can be stored into a
>> >>  function cell just as any other object can be (and void can be a
>> >>  valid function if you define it with defun).”
>> >
>> > Why do you think the original text needs to be corrected?
>> 
>> Indeed, `nil` is treated specially to mean "not defined" when we try to
>> call a function:
>> 
>>     Lisp_Object
>>     funcall_general (Lisp_Object fun, ptrdiff_t numargs, Lisp_Object *args)
>>     {
>>       Lisp_Object original_fun = fun;
>>      retry:
>>       if (SYMBOLP (fun) && !NILP (fun)
>>           && (fun = XSYMBOL (fun)->u.s.function, SYMBOLP (fun)))
>>         fun = indirect_function (fun);
>>     
>>       if (SUBRP (fun) && !SUBR_NATIVE_COMPILED_DYNP (fun))
>>         return funcall_subr (XSUBR (fun), numargs, args);
>>       else if (COMPILEDP (fun)
>>                || SUBR_NATIVE_COMPILED_DYNP (fun)
>>                || MODULE_FUNCTIONP (fun))
>>         return funcall_lambda (fun, numargs, args);
>>       else
>>         {
>>           if (NILP (fun))
>>             xsignal1 (Qvoid_function, original_fun);
>> 
>
> Thanks.  So I think our documentation is correct in this aspect, and
> I'm therefore closing this bug.

The current text suggest that `nil` "can be valid [a]
function if you define [it] in turn with defun", which is not really true.


        Stefan