From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unicode build: "comparison is always true" warnings Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:02:02 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87oddltv7f.fsf@everybody.org> <87hcjcoo2x.fsf@everybody.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195848157 1830 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2007 20:02:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Mark A. Hershberger" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 23 21:02:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ivejb-0005VL-Vn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:02:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IvejN-0001E2-Jm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:02:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ivej8-00010K-Ma for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:02:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ivej6-0000ws-3f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:02:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ivej5-0000wU-KN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:02:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ivej4-00009O-K5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:02:11 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170CB2CF617; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:02:09 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1013FE0; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:02:02 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8C1A16CA9D; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:02:02 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:52:18 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:84004 Archived-At: >>> (The use of mktemp is not really bad here anyway.) >> Why not? > Because it is used securely. I assumed that's what you meant. The question is: why is it secure in this case? Stefan