From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: m17n, otf0 and configuring on Kubuntu Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:09:43 -0500 Message-ID: References: <47C419C9.8030004@alice.it> <8763wb9222.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <47C441DB.2000200@swipnet.se> <47C51010.4030003@swipnet.se> <47C525C7.5030709@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204128884 7433 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2008 16:14:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: miles@gnu.org, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org, angelo.graziosi@alice.it, Jason Rumney To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 17:15:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JUOuq-0006JU-HA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:13:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUOuK-000659-9v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:13:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUOrB-00049Y-B2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:10:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUOr6-00047l-Km for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:10:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUOr6-00047d-Fm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:10:04 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUOqz-0004Kb-8z; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:09:57 -0500 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (vpn-132-204-232-211.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.211]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m1RG9rJu028930; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:09:53 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C1BB3B40C5; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:09:43 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Kenichi Handa's message of "Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:57:56 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered BAYES_00=-2.5, HAS_X_HELO=0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90627 Archived-At: > So, perhaps the more correct message is: > Local system font yes/no > or > Font Antialiasing yes/no > On GNU/Linux, it's yes iff one of xft and ftx font backends > is available. The summary configure outputs at the end is meant to describe the details of the build, not the behavior of the resulting binary. So I think the current message is better than talking about things like anti-aliasing. Stefan