From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
Cc: 2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, ams@gnu.org
Subject: bug#2282: Bug#2282: rmail-summary splits frame into three parts
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:42:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jwveio3hhrr.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AFBC517.40605@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:19:35 +0100")
>> I'm tempted to just replace all pop-to-buffers in rmail*.el with
>>
>> (defun rmail-pop-to-buffer (buffer-or-name &optional other-window norecord)
>> (let (split-width-threshold)
>> (pop-to-buffer buffer-or-name other-window norecord)))
> I suppose the following code in `rmail-new-summary' is responsible for
> the behavior described earlier.
> (if (and (one-window-p)
> pop-up-windows
> (not pop-up-frames))
> ;; If there is just one window, put the summary on the top.
> (progn
> (split-window (selected-window) rmail-summary-window-size)
> (select-window (next-window (frame-first-window)))
> (pop-to-buffer rmail-summary-buffer)
> ;; If pop-to-buffer did not use that window, delete that
> ;; window. (This can happen if it uses another frame.)
> (if (not (eq rmail-summary-buffer
> (window-buffer (frame-first-window))))
> (delete-other-windows)))
> (pop-to-buffer rmail-summary-buffer))
> What is that code supposed to do what a simple `pop-to-buffer' cannot
> accomplish? If it's to display the summary on top of the frame, then
> splitting horizontally obviously won't make sense here.
Hmm... maybe I misunderstood and the problem may indeed not be in
pop-to-buffer, in the end.
Stefan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-12 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-10 2:09 bug#2282: Bug#2282: rmail-summary splits frame into three parts Glenn Morris
2009-11-10 7:48 ` Juri Linkov
2009-11-10 17:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-11 17:22 ` Alfred M. Szmidt
2009-11-12 7:24 ` Glenn Morris
2009-11-12 8:19 ` martin rudalics
2009-11-12 15:42 ` Stefan Monnier [this message]
2009-11-12 15:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-11-12 17:40 ` martin rudalics
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jwveio3hhrr.fsf-monnier+emacsbugreports@gnu.org \
--to=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=2282@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com \
--cc=ams@gnu.org \
--cc=rudalics@gmx.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.