From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: GDB on Mac is (NOT) Broken Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:43:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <19357.53872.672127.600861@totara.tehura.co.nz> <19359.5799.721358.312552@totara.tehura.co.nz> <19365.49601.379093.424303@totara.tehura.co.nz> <19366.56894.138747.370358@totara.tehura.co.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269265431 9841 80.91.229.12 (22 Mar 2010 13:43:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: nickrob@snap.net.nz (Nick Roberts) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 14:43:46 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nthuu-00073G-M5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:43:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53111 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nthut-0002DU-Q5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:43:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nthuo-0002Br-4O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:43:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39933 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nthum-0002A9-W4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:43:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nthul-0002HQ-Qi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:43:32 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:64969 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nthul-0002HJ-OJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:43:31 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAP8Qp0vO+IPa/2dsb2JhbACbK3S6S4R9BIsd X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,287,1267419600"; d="scan'208";a="58794146" Original-Received: from 206-248-131-218.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.131.218]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2010 09:43:30 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id F329B660F2; Mon, 22 Mar 2010 09:43:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <19366.56894.138747.370358@totara.tehura.co.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:04:30 +1300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122468 Archived-At: >> > To be safer you need to add something like: >> > (gdb-enqueue-input (list "server show version\n" 'gdb-apple-test))) >> That's probably better in some sense, but it's less "obviously safe for >> GNU". ... > How is it unsafe? It changes the set of commands passed between Emacs and GDB, so it's not obviously "safe" (in the sense of "cannot introduce a change in behavior"). Stefan