From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gtk tabs in emacs, new branch Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:38:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4BB4CF6B.2000007@alice.it> <4BB59476.7010600@swipnet.se> <4BB5C01E.10701@alice.it> <87y6h5ket5.fsf@siart.de> <4BB637F8.2070105@censorshipresearch.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1270240702 24006 80.91.229.12 (2 Apr 2010 20:38:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2010 20:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Uwe Siart , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 02 22:38:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nxnd6-0000BT-UL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 22:38:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33353 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nxnd6-00013y-80 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:38:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nxnd1-00013Y-2j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34053 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nxncz-000133-MO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nxncy-00067J-Ex for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:38:05 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:63205 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nxncy-00067F-Ch for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Apr 2010 16:38:04 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAA7ytUtFpZE8/2dsb2JhbACbTHKzc4UFBIsn X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,354,1267419600"; d="scan'208";a="60132989" Original-Received: from 69-165-145-60.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.145.60]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 02 Apr 2010 16:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 92F4185F0; Fri, 2 Apr 2010 16:38:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4BB637F8.2070105@censorshipresearch.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Fri, 02 Apr 2010 14:31:20 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123079 Archived-At: > It seems the most natural thing to do is to kill the buffer iff the > window killed by closing a tab is the last window showing the given buffer. [ I mostly use one frame per buffer and indeed have such a key binding to kill the buffer and the frame. ] Doing it for the *Messages* buffer is a bad idea, in my experience. In any case, this issue has nothing to do with tabs since it also appears in many other contexts. Stefan