From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:30:11 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87631jvpzg.fsf@gmail.com> <4C18211C.3070106@harpegolden.net> <87vd9j5neu.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <83sk4misf2.fsf@gnu.org> <83iq5hiiin.fsf@gnu.org> <83fx0lihov.fsf@gnu.org> <838w6cixma.fsf@gnu.org> <83y6ech1oo.fsf@gnu.org> <83ocf8gx7e.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276885824 6325 80.91.229.12 (18 Jun 2010 18:30:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 18 20:30:21 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPgKa-0000qY-AY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 20:30:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40423 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPgKZ-0002o2-O0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:30:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50742 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPgKU-0002mO-Hh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPgKT-0005MQ-G9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:30:14 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:10029 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPgKR-0005M7-TS; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:30:12 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAI5XG0xLd+Hj/2dsb2JhbACfEnLDBIUbBI0Y X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,440,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="68370991" Original-Received: from 75-119-225-227.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.225.227]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 18 Jun 2010 14:30:11 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1358F7F26; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:30:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83ocf8gx7e.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 18 Jun 2010 18:46:45 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126189 Archived-At: > According to my reading, it stops the search for point if it is more > than 10 lines below (resp above) the scroll margin. The reason is > speed, as the comment says. Can we safely assume that whoever sets > scroll-conservatively to the maximum value gives up this speed > consideration? I think so, yes. Stefan