From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6835: 23.2; eval'ing `type-of' with #[abc] as arg gets a Fatal error (11) Segmentation fault Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:20:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281559126 8765 80.91.229.12 (11 Aug 2010 20:38:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Kevin Rodgers Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 11 22:38:42 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjI4Q-0002ba-0e for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:38:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56755 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OjI4P-0007Kg-FD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:38:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42784 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OjI4I-0007II-DZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:38:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjI4H-0001z1-A1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:38:34 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjI4H-0001yw-6Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:38:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjHmN-0006Ic-OP; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:20:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:20:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6835 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.128155798724205 (code B ref -1); Wed, 11 Aug 2010 20:20:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Aug 2010 20:19:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjHm7-0006IM-8h for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:19:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjHm5-0006IG-7N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:19:45 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:56946) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OjHmq-0001MF-KB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:20:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59367 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OjHmm-0001wF-62 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:20:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjHmk-0007ni-UB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:20:28 -0400 Original-Received: from impaqm2.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.2]:59814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjHmk-0007nN-Ng for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:20:26 -0400 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost3.adm.correo ([10.20.102.124]) by IMPaqm2.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id t8KR1e01C2h2L9m3M8LRVC; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:20:25 +0200 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([83.40.4.203]) by IMPmailhost3.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id t8LQ1e0084NokFF1j8LRzk; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:20:25 +0200 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-TE-authinfo: authemail="monnier$movistar.es" |auth_email="monnier@movistar.es" X-TE-AcuTerraCos: auth_cuTerraCos="cosuitnetc01" Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 699F2660F0; Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:20:24 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Kevin Rodgers's message of "Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:42:20 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:20:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:39430 Archived-At: >> Yes and no. Should (lambda 3) be accepted by functionp? What about >> (lambda () . 3) ? What about (lambda () (+ . 1)) and other errors? > I don't see why those examples should satisfy functionp. The Elisp > manual says: Because (lambda () 1) is a valid function that can be passed to `funcall'. > I think your examples are merely cons objects that look like lambda > expressions (a function subtype) but are not. They're both cons objects and functions. > But it is useful to know whether the error is signaled by funcall or > by the function. Why? Stefan