From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Split byte-recompile-directory into byte-recompile-file Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:35:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1285082770-28535-1-git-send-email-julien@danjou.info> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285450534 12136 80.91.229.12 (25 Sep 2010 21:35:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:35:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Julien Danjou Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 25 23:35:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzcP3-0006ks-IQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:35:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43008 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OzcP2-0006LW-JK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:35:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42747 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OzcOw-0006LR-MQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:35:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzcOu-0001xg-NW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:35:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:38435) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzcOu-0001xb-Kw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:35:20 -0400 Original-Received: from dyn.144-85-161-081.dsl.vtx.ch ([144.85.161.81]:10869 helo=fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzcOu-0006RT-9s; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:35:20 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C139B6611D; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:35:21 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1285082770-28535-1-git-send-email-julien@danjou.info> (Julien Danjou's message of "Tue, 21 Sep 2010 17:26:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130881 Archived-At: Introducing byte-recompile-file doesn't sound like a bad idea, but I'm not sure that function needs to be nearly as complex. How 'bout changing the code you sent so that the new byte-compile-file is not interactive any more and provides barely more than the code you extract from byte-recompile-directory? Stefan