From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding GnuTLS to the Windows port Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 20:09:49 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286893901 8625 80.91.229.12 (12 Oct 2010 14:31:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 12 16:31:38 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P5ft8-0002B1-7n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:31:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60877 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5ffW-0008VH-9L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 10:17:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51600 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P5egR-0006B6-IJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:14:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5egP-0007Jt-LM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:14:22 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:4587 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P5egN-0007Id-C0; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:14:19 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkEJAG78s0xMCpJQ/2dsb2JhbACgVHxyvTeFSASSDQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,320,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="78668975" Original-Received: from 76-10-146-80.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([76.10.146.80]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 12 Oct 2010 09:14:18 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D1ACDAE516; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 20:09:49 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:06:57 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131634 Archived-At: >> > The only point I care about, really, is that such a change be made >> > keeping in mind the likely future addition of a more general >> > support for dynamic loading. >> >> I cannot comment on that, as I know nothing about the future "general >> support for dynamic loading", other than the legal issues that were >> commented here a while ago. > I don't see how the machinery in question can get in the way of the > more general support for dynamic loading. Having an alist of > libraries indexed by the features which need them is something we will > need to keep if we want true dynamic loading. Good, thanks. Then please go ahead, Stefan