From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7503: copy-and-insert-previous-line Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:57:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: <4CF22EA9.3020207@inducks.org> <4CF26801.9060901@inducks.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290971730 8276 80.91.229.12 (28 Nov 2010 19:15:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:15:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , 7503@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mads Jensen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 28 20:15:26 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMmia-0002t8-5R for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:15:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46750 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMmiZ-0005j3-Cj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:15:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51774 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PMmi7-0005W8-RT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:14:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMmi6-0004oP-RK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:14:55 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PMmi6-0004oK-Ol for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:14:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMmMv-0004nq-Oj; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:53:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:53:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7503 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7503-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7503.129097034618411 (code B ref 7503); Sun, 28 Nov 2010 18:53:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7503) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Nov 2010 18:52:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMmML-0004mu-Cv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:52:25 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PMmMJ-0004mh-Q7 for 7503@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:52:24 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id oASIvpZ5028687; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:57:52 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2E286A85F1; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:57:51 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4CF26801.9060901@inducks.org> (Mads Jensen's message of "Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:32:33 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3693=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 13:53:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:41974 Archived-At: > There is a difference between my version, and this one, as mine doesn't > add the newline-character from the end of the previous line. I think such differences is the reason why such commands are not very good candidates for inclusion in Emacs: there are so many different commands that do something along these lines, that adding them all would not make much sense. Luckily, we do have two generic solutions for it: - you can define it in Elisp as you've done. - you can define it as a macro. Stefan