From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: old-style backquotes now generates void macro Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:00:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87mxoawchk.fsf@anar.kanru.info> <874oahmd96.fsf@anar.kanru.info> <877hf8mdev.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292623237 13852 80.91.229.12 (17 Dec 2010 22:00:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:00:37 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 17 23:00:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTiLl-0000Cw-RA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:00:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37628 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTiLl-0000Mn-C7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:00:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36317 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PTiLg-0000Jf-2S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:00:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTiLe-0002Oq-Ty for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:00:23 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:23627 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PTiLe-0002Ob-QE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:00:22 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjQFALdrC03O+KHE/2dsb2JhbACWHI4VdL97hUoEhGWOEQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,190,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="85759034" Original-Received: from 206-248-161-196.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.161.196]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 17 Dec 2010 17:00:21 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5EEF466112; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:00:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <877hf8mdev.fsf@engster.org> (David Engster's message of "Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:01:44 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133775 Archived-At: > Currently, the change to lread.c broke the grammar generation in CEDET. > The culprit is that > (read "( ,(cons $1 $3 ) )") > used to return > (\, (cons $1 $3)) That is the interpretation if we take the above , to be an old-style unquote. > but now returns > ((\, (cons $1 $3))) That is the interpretation if we take the above , to be an new-style unquote. > Does CEDET depend on some obsoleted feature here, meaning this should > rather be fixed in CEDET than Emacs? Yes. Stefan