From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6339: url-filename => "/c:/some/file.txt" Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:43:41 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317905050 26725 80.91.229.12 (6 Oct 2011 12:44:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Kevin Rodgers , 6339@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 06 14:44:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBnIt-0002aR-Mq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 14:43:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48511 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBnIt-0008GM-A6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:43:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBnIp-0008GC-SR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:43:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBnIo-0005KJ-Rb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:43:55 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53398) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBnIo-0005KD-Q2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:43:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBnIw-00069Q-TV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:44:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6339 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6339-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6339.131790504123625 (code B ref 6339); Thu, 06 Oct 2011 12:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6339) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2011 12:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBnIv-00068z-2j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:44:01 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBnIq-00068h-Sl; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:43:57 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgwKAMOhjU7O+JxS/2dsb2JhbABEmQ2PIIEGgVMBAQQBViMQCw4mEhQYDSSIEbcMhywEoQyERA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,496,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="140138849" Original-Received: from 206-248-156-82.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.156.82]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 06 Oct 2011 08:43:42 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2FC20592D4; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 08:43:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:56:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 08:44:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52272 Archived-At: >> Don't you mean: (expand-file-name (url-filename ...) "/") > That's better and more correct, yes. > BTW, I would like to know whether we will finally do anything with > this bug. The fix is clear, is just that apparently some people > dislike it. Could someone (re)send the proposed patch? Stefan