From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9532: 24.0.50; `special-display-regexps' is no longer respected Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:26:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: <9202F08DB196437E8AD75A3C535E5A7D@us.oracle.com> <87y5xlg9xq.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <1D79C6CD14EE4C76B74C446E04B9CA65@us.oracle.com> <85680E6E160C472FBC47C2FDA86BA171@us.oracle.com> <874o05x4l6.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <208166A8F7EF4681B76EADADCA39822C@us.oracle.com> <877h51n82z.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <8AAF50092BB64E5F8A2E82AF50CC04DB@us.oracle.com> <23EB914729DE4B62AF7CBB9AB099B0F8@us.oracle.com> <5DC47C873F1B444AA60B3D2EC2467A57@us.oracle.com> <2AF8377768F44B7DAA1A96BBE6D1DF2A@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320758840 25040 80.91.229.12 (8 Nov 2011 13:27:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:27:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9532@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 08 14:27:16 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlhs-0007Kp-1t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 14:27:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59150 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlhr-0003HM-LQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:27:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:60506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlho-0003E1-Db for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:27:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlhh-0000J2-Je for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:27:12 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52937) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlhh-0000Is-Ft for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:27:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlkY-0000vj-6x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:30:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9532 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9532-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9532.13207589723520 (code B ref 9532); Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9532) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Nov 2011 13:29:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlk3-0000ui-1P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:29:32 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RNlk0-0000ua-Ju for 9532@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:29:29 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAFstuU5MCoYy/2dsb2JhbABDqgSBBoFyAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBW4FIktBIgLmVqESA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,477,1315195200"; d="scan'208";a="146853627" Original-Received: from 76-10-134-50.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.134.50]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 08 Nov 2011 08:26:29 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A14A8590B2; Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:26:28 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <2AF8377768F44B7DAA1A96BBE6D1DF2A@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 7 Nov 2011 22:47:08 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:30:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53694 Archived-At: > I redefine `switch-to-buffer' in my code so that it autofits the frame to the > buffer content. My redefinition (so far) keeps the original (Emacs 20...23) > signature, however: (switch-to-buffer BUFFER &optional NORECORD) If you don't like such breakage, better use an around-advice than a redefinition (it won't protect you from all such breakages, but it'll help). > Is this really the way things will be? Yes. > it? What used to be simple and symmetric is now quite kludgy, no? Why is > `pop-up-windows' still blessed but `pop-up-frames' verboten? It's not blessed and neither is the other verboten. Both are obsolete. Stefan