From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10946: 24.0.94; eval-after-load incompatible change Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:06:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331140072 15434 80.91.229.3 (7 Mar 2012 17:07:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10946@debbugs.gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 07 18:07:50 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S5KL7-00088E-2W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:07:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36552 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5KL6-0003OI-8X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:07:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5KL0-0003LZ-DB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:07:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5KKq-0008Di-JL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:07:41 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S5KKq-0008De-Fp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:07:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S5KLJ-0005C5-WE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10946 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10946-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10946.133114004719921 (code B ref 10946); Wed, 07 Mar 2012 17:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10946) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2012 17:07:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37807 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S5KKk-0005B4-Ta for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:07:27 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:13498) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S5KKY-0005AR-DT for 10946@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:07:14 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAKU/KE9FxJvl/2dsb2JhbACBX5x7eYhwnhmGGQSGUJRJhAs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="166515403" Original-Received: from 69-196-155-229.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([69.196.155.229]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 07 Mar 2012 12:06:13 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 74EA56002; Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:06:13 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Wed, 07 Mar 2012 07:49:37 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57553 Archived-At: >> I don't understand why it should have such a consequence. > Because now you have to worry about load-file-name, which means > (eval-after-load 'feature ... ) does nothing unless the file provided > that feature is loaded. i.e. it is almost the same as (eval-after-load > "file" ...). I didn't mean to say that provide should run the after-load thingies when load-file-name is nil. I meant to say that in your case, this would only be a workaround, whereas the real fix should be to setup load-file-name appropriately (tho it's only a guess on my part, since I don't fully understand what's going on). Stefan