From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Old/unused display bits Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:20:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: <510278F1.3040904@yandex.ru> <83a9rxl6fx.fsf@gnu.org> <5102A007.3020106@cua.dk> <834ni5l0wh.fsf@gnu.org> <5102B13A.4050902@cua.dk> <83wqv1jbdk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359152468 27063 80.91.229.3 (25 Jan 2013 22:21:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kim Storm To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 25 23:21:26 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TyreG-0004d1-Nb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:21:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32775 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tyrdz-00071x-6Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:21:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50649) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tyrdv-00071n-2G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:21:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tyrdt-0006hi-UZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp208.alice.it ([82.57.200.104]:51972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tyrdr-0006hN-UG; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:21:00 -0500 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (82.107.57.105) by smtp208.alice.it (8.6.060.12) id 50FF9F1D008CEA56; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 23:20:57 +0100 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C709BAE194; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 17:20:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83wqv1jbdk.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:44:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.104 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:156638 Archived-At: > I don't think we should remove redisplay-dont-pause. It was only > turned on by default in Emacs 24.1, and it's not yet clear whether the > non-nil is a "fits all" value. Agreed, it's too early to remove it. > I never used the other 2 options. I don't think I have a slow line to > see them in action. It is probably safe to say that > PERIODIC_PREEMPTION_CHECKING was not used by too many people in their > day to day work. We I think it's OK to remove PERIODIC_PREEMPTION_CHECKING and redisplay-preemption-period (which is only defined if you set PERIODIC_PREEMPTION_CHECKING). [ BTW, it seems that in the current code, Vredisplay_preemption_period is read but is never initialized, unless you compile with PERIODIC_PREEMPTION_CHECKING. ] Stefan