From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13999: 24.3.50; rng-validate-while-idle -> (error "Selecting deleted buffer") Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:34:01 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1363973711 8882 80.91.229.3 (22 Mar 2013 17:35:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13999@debbugs.gnu.org, Carsten Bormann To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 22 18:35:36 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ5sK-0004Lk-P6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:35:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50171 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ5rx-0007pP-Ci for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:35:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42333) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ5ru-0007ne-4P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ5rs-0006yI-Sz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:35:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37060) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ5rs-0006y6-Qh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:35:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ5tl-00079W-Ki for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:37:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:37:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13999 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13999-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13999.136397376427413 (code B ref 13999); Fri, 22 Mar 2013 17:37:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13999) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Mar 2013 17:36:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41169 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ5sp-000785-5u for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:57163) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UJ5sm-00077g-Gp for 13999@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id r2MHY1I5020789; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A665567C05; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:34:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Fri, 22 Mar 2013 22:39:29 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4526=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9362 : core <4526> : streams <925797> : uri <1373635> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:72796 Archived-At: >>> The code in rng-valid.el uses the following idiom to redisplay without >>> triggering idle timers. >> Why does it need to do that? > Does the following make any sense? No, I don't understand what problem this is trying to avoid. If noone understands this hack, I suggest to get rid of this let-binding, and if/when the corresponding problem ever appears, we'll see about fixing it some other way. Stefan