From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: check_window_system Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:21:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83zjxddp38.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365278576 28886 80.91.229.3 (6 Apr 2013 20:02:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 20:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dmitry Antipov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 06 22:02:55 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UOZJe-0001Uu-Hr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 22:02:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60982 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UO8TI-0001t9-HN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:22:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55783) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UO8SK-0000nq-Tg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:21:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UO8SG-0004tK-1l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:21:32 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:17809) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UO8SA-0004sH-0y; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:21:22 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxLSu/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOfXIUegV6DEw X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFFxLSu/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOfXIUegV6DEw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="6567063" Original-Received: from 69-196-180-174.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.180.174]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 05 Apr 2013 11:21:18 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 17C8D67A24; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 11:21:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83zjxddp38.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:33:31 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158711 Archived-At: > Thus, after the changes above, we have 4 different implementations of > the same function check_window_system, which means it would be [...] > etc., you get the idea. IOW, there should be no assumption that X, > NS, and w32 are mutually exclusive. Right: 4 implementations of the same function is a problem in itself (we have this problem in several places in Emacs, but we should try to get rid of them, rather than add more). Stefan