From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs completion matches selection UI Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 13:12:09 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388599946 19605 80.91.229.3 (1 Jan 2014 18:12:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 18:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Barry OReilly Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 01 19:12:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VyQHM-00059J-P0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 19:12:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42070 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VyQHM-0006is-6S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 13:12:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35563) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VyQHC-0006hj-K3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 13:12:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VyQH5-0004YW-AE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 13:12:18 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:7464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VyQH5-0004YM-68 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 13:12:11 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+J7K/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFHO+J7K/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOIYZwZgV6DFQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="43718796" Original-Received: from 206-248-158-202.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.158.202]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 01 Jan 2014 13:12:09 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8B42960047; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 13:12:09 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Barry OReilly's message of "Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:35:07 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167020 Archived-At: > It would be good to clarify whether the fallback mechanism should be > for the key sequence or the command. That is: should calling the > command via M-x cause the fallback behavior? Good question. It is clearly much easier to do it for the command. Maybe we should think about providing a standard way to do it for a key sequence. Not clear how best to do it, tho. We can use the "menu-item :filter" trick, but I'm not sure it's a good idea to go down that path. Stefan