From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs pretest -- electric-pair-mode change Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:24:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87d2h0ujls.fsf_-_@kitaj.lan> <8761mqfw38.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1396535111 31542 80.91.229.3 (3 Apr 2014 14:25:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 14:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 03 16:25:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WViZj-0003bt-98 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 16:25:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44368 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WViZi-0004At-S7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41761) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WViZZ-00049U-0K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:25:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WViZR-0000RC-Gu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:24:52 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:41524) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WViZR-0000R7-Bm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 10:24:45 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id s33EOg2a005834; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 10:24:42 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4F22D6020F; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 10:24:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8761mqfw38.fsf@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:15:07 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4901=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9378 : core <4901> : inlines <687> : streams <1151196> : uri <1719157> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:171273 Archived-At: > Since it's not commonly used, yet, any possible breakage introduced with > this change would also be less of a problem. Good point. Still, I think that code that needs to parse the whole buffer is a problem. And UI behavior that needs that is even worse. Stefan