From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: From etags to ctags? Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 14:00:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20140604142339.GA27417@debian> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401904879 31541 80.91.229.3 (4 Jun 2014 18:01:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 18:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Danil Orlov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 04 20:01:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WsFUt-0007wJ-KL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 20:01:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35894 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsFUt-000721-74 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 14:01:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsFUf-0006uB-MR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 14:01:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsFUX-00035K-Af for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 14:00:57 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:45756) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WsFUX-00035B-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 14:00:49 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArYGAIDvNVPO+IOj/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA0CYEXF3SCJQEBAQECAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgECNIZF456B4Q4BKkZgWqDTCE X-IPAS-Result: ArYGAIDvNVPO+IOj/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA0CYEXF3SCJQEBAQECAVYjBQsLDiYSFBgNJIgECNIZF456B4Q4BKkZgWqDTCE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="65699356" Original-Received: from 206-248-131-163.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.131.163]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 04 Jun 2014 14:00:47 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id AEFBB600A6; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:00:47 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20140604142339.GA27417@debian> (Danil Orlov's message of "Wed, 4 Jun 2014 18:23:39 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172338 Archived-At: > How do you think, does it make sense to create direct support of ctags > format, like it done for etags now? Sure. And it wouldn't surprise me if such support already exists "out there". Stefan