From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18265: 24.3.92; lisp-completion-at-point should return nil in comments, unless after ` Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:00:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86egwjgtju.fsf@yandex.ru> <53ED7AC0.1050607@yandex.ru> <53EEAD9D.5010500@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1408212089 23293 80.91.229.3 (16 Aug 2014 18:01:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 18:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18265@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 16 20:01:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XIiI5-0005VE-O7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 20:01:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36220 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIiI5-0004J6-AW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:01:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54195) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIiHv-0004I9-91 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:01:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIiHm-0004oh-VV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:01:11 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37853) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XIiHm-0004od-SL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XIiHm-00068E-IU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 18:01:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18265 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18265-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18265.140821205122780 (code B ref 18265); Sat, 16 Aug 2014 18:01:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18265) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2014 18:00:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44796 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XIiHa-0005uY-IN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:00:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]:41379) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XIiHX-0005r9-Qe for 18265@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:00:48 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4621E84F2B; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:00:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB6D1E5B8A; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:00:22 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by lechon.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D4610B40CD; Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:00:22 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <53EEAD9D.5010500@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Sat, 16 Aug 2014 05:02:21 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, MC_TSTLAST 0.00) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:92489 Archived-At: > You've called ":exclusive no" a hack yourself before, and :merge-with-rest > looks not much different to me, going counter to the c-a-p-f interface. While it's "counter to the c-a-p-f interface", the need to combine several backends is sufficiently common that we need to support it somehow. I hope a "merge" solution can use a less hackish solution than the current ":exclusive no". > It raises questions, like if `lisp-completion-at-point' would like to be > merged with the rest, will it be merged with all of them? That'd be my choice, so far, yes. > Won't the other completion functions get a choice in the matter? Not sure if/when this would be needed. I'd rather avoid it if I can. > What if one of them is smart enough to provide all completions for the > current context, by itself? Then it should come earlier. > And anyway, it doesn't seem to help with the distinction between manual and > idle completion, Indeed, it's a largely orthogonal issue. Stefan