From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:17:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87wq6uj5gt.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416233868 7482 80.91.229.3 (17 Nov 2014 14:17:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 17 15:17:40 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqN7b-00078C-Li for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:17:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48117 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqN7b-0005V4-2g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:17:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39025) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqN7Q-0005UP-Ny for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:17:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqN7J-0002W5-4R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:17:28 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:7691) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqN7J-0002Vr-0u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:17:21 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsUIAGA2ZVSnWBqE/2dsb2JhbABbgw6KYssMBAICgRwXAQEBAQEBfIQDAQEDAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSISwnRBAEBAQEGAQEBAR6NWIM8B4RLBYwLk1qDT5FkhBofgnsBAQE X-IPAS-Result: AsUIAGA2ZVSnWBqE/2dsb2JhbABbgw6KYssMBAICgRwXAQEBAQEBfIQDAQEDAVYjEAs0EhQYDSSISwnRBAEBAQEGAQEBAR6NWIM8B4RLBYwLk1qDT5FkhBofgnsBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,380,1413259200"; d="scan'208";a="97183213" Original-Received: from 167-88-26-132.cpe.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([167.88.26.132]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 17 Nov 2014 09:17:20 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id F18F28548; Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:17:19 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Mon, 17 Nov 2014 14:59:48 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177410 Archived-At: >> Feature branch or emacs-24 please. It should be applicable to >> emacs-24, and the maintainers have requested we work against emacs-24 in >> those cases, forward-porting the changes into master. > I don't think emacs-24 is supposed to receive new features, only bug > fixes. Indeed. I could consider including it in a 24.5 release because it's a somewhat important issue, but it would have to be "obviously safe" (in the sense of "won't break anything"). That sounds fairly unlikely. Stefan