From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is there a way to inhibit message3 from Elisp? Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:51:17 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87618psiu4.fsf@gmail.com> <87a8y1l3ho.fsf@gmail.com> <83618o4eom.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhhke5s1.fsf@gmail.com> <831tjc4ah3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429710730 3447 80.91.229.3 (22 Apr 2015 13:52:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Oleh Krehel , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 22 15:51:55 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykv4B-0005IA-HY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:51:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35340 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykv4A-0005ms-TN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:51:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45675) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykv3m-0005L9-7Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:51:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykv3g-0004tY-PG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:51:26 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:43977) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykv3g-0004tG-JR; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:51:20 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t3MDpH9E018543; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:51:17 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A3D25FAA; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 09:51:17 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <831tjc4ah3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:24:24 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV5284=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5284> : inlines <2775> : streams <1426730> : uri <1913023> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185778 Archived-At: > I think it's OK, with a few minor comments: > +** New variable `inhibit-message', when bound to t, inhibits the No, as I said I want a variable to *redirect* not to inhibit, Stefan