From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 2 release blocking bugs left for 25.1! Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:07:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87fus6vkh9.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466510841 13180 80.91.229.3 (21 Jun 2016 12:07:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:07:21 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 21 14:07:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bFKSJ-0006ol-VQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:07:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51320 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFKSJ-0000wP-6q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:06:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFKSD-0000wF-EY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:06:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFKSA-0004Vv-8Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:06:53 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33287) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bFKSA-0004Vg-1r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 08:06:50 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bFKS6-0006df-SV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:06:47 +0200 Original-Received: from 76-10-168-254.dsl.teksavvy.com ([76.10.168.254]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:06:46 +0200 Original-Received: from monnier by 76-10-168-254.dsl.teksavvy.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:06:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 76-10-168-254.dsl.teksavvy.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:rDwo42wwg6E5Z4IeJXV2V+gy/pQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:204637 Archived-At: >>> I'd like to suggest 23785 as a blocker also -- the bug (in the report) is >>> not too serious, but as a fix may involve a change in the command loop, I'd >>> rather do this before a RC. >> If the bug is not too serious, can you explain the rationale for making it a >> blocker? > The symptoms are not too serious, but it's a bug in the undo system, so > may have significant implications elsewhere. And it's a regression in 25.1 due to the new undo code. Stefan