From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 ec02c73: Update process filter example (Bug#35044) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:54:39 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20190501005253.12791.10999@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20190501005255.2DF9B2042B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="13762"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Noam Postavsky To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 01 04:55:00 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hLfOb-0003QB-Pq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 May 2019 04:54:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60613 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLfOa-0006Zj-Q4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:54:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLfOS-0006ZL-01 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:54:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLfOO-00063y-Ta for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:54:47 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:40860) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLfOO-00063a-Ol for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:54:44 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x412seLf021316; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:54:41 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7EC6266184; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:54:39 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20190501005255.2DF9B2042B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Tue, 30 Apr 2019 20:52:54 -0400 (EDT)") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6536=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6536> : inlines <7066> : streams <1820219> : uri <2839117> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236085 Archived-At: > * doc/lispref/processes.texi (Filter Functions): Use > insert-before-markers in the "ordinary" filter example, like > internal-default-process-filter does. In my experience, insert-before-markers is a source of problems down the road, so I'd recommend not to encourage its use by showing it in example code where it's not strictly needed. Stefan