From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f8fed41 2/3: image-dired: Improve XDG compliance Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:48:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83sfwp1c27.fsf@gnu.org> <87y26hqdxy.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32360"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 25 19:54:00 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mf4Aa-0008EQ-Bw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 19:54:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40820 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mf4AY-0001wr-Cc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:53:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49940) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mf46c-0002DX-UZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:49:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:5030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mf46Y-0003yo-BO; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:49:52 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 111FE440814; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:49:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BF3F344045F; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:49:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1635184185; bh=4WwAIJr8QAR9ORQ7Oiu0AIVBXPS7alCxkQJ4aQtUpDw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=ShaAJkretcnmCkK5HQG8+1Ebe8Yfpn4OBkRkGP7PulDDfhWAABTNR/QBDZSZi5OMe zz5XIZ1fHxamnlCTwsY7OY74p7Uq8df6t17wfzwa1A2ghzE9VMoc/fV5S91GBsG94J /9L2HaMyjyAxmJJr3ZaQ5PCDmfcCJy6SkBmhGNfu6q1jSwjzmrrmbqzUzWqkUoJi4Z /iB0Qi4gtzIZT3lmiwWjJExq3HG7uH8YBo4GuN4XdMnxo7UQAoa3TSbGwefjJBL0/d qouIcTB5yI7QdFhfzJixIz5oUm5HC79gQq8wXHEKssIjOnwmdnaNfoSp2ujBKa5oX3 AXGDtyyNGNipA== Original-Received: from alfajor (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4A571204FB; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 13:49:45 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87y26hqdxy.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:14:33 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277771 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic [2021-10-25 16:14:33] wrote: > Eli Zaretskii writes: >> XDG is also prone to fashion changes. What will we do when it goes >> out of fashion, and we have dozens of xdg-user-dir calls in our >> application code? change all of them to some latest desktop fashion? > What do you mean by this? The YEH spec from the Wayland++ guys is quite different, for one. > Shouldn't XDG as a specification prevent this > from being an issue? It did back when people cared about it, but freedesktop.org has been inaccesible for a few years now, Stefan from the future