From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master af0ea35ea0: Tweak how functions are formatted in Implementation in *Help* Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:18:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <164872671963.30191.4037902323881017518@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220331113841.3BBFAC0581F@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87pmm2qnkl.fsf@gmail.com> <87h77bliwl.fsf@gnus.org> <87zgl3im3j.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfqujs5o.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4899"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Robert Pluim , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 03 18:19:40 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nb2x2-000179-Cl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 18:19:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40836 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nb2x0-0000gP-VR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:19:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:51674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nb2vs-0008Po-CX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:18:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:43327) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nb2vq-0004YL-2g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2022 12:18:27 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1454D440C08; Sun, 3 Apr 2022 12:18:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 92E3944088A; Sun, 3 Apr 2022 12:18:22 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1649002702; bh=e+r9RFAyTnFua81YiyJPmSOUc238OKiUelr/z6S0P+g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Vmpm9w58vzaqNwD7BpEz3TYclgRSJvBVtxX84Qd7BJzLLoiXJUSCQvAjzEuPKOkrZ Kf1cEagp8ki7/+5wk5kUrl1ZDk4HenF2OwJtZwoB3Voe+7kAQso+XbQo+rwsXWQ80F pAQzGlkPoySbVAbky98mupE/yL1TilUFJpLAsxhrDDm4Qab54WfdsxS1NJzV6NQOgf lQPnz43xSdrc1hSqRjT9d0gMh1I14sbBOjMq5F62pYk4HnUHKK/p0xHkfav1EvnCXf B9BW7CIbD6Ej8Nnuz25iSfv4j1gHdLc+4ywsPdlF8+0CH7E7hnkalh/T7azG6EYQr9 dGziEf1EG7jwg== Original-Received: from milanesa (unknown [45.72.221.51]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C5A7120384; Sun, 3 Apr 2022 12:18:22 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87sfqujs5o.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Sun, 03 Apr 2022 13:57:39 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:287736 Archived-At: >> (cl-generic-generalizers TYPE) in =E2=80=98cl-generic.el=E2=80=99. >> :extra "typeof" > > I still don't understand what the :extra "typeof" is trying to tell me. > :-) Not sure what we can do about it, tho. It's not like qualifiers (which are what those things are) are self evident if you don't know about them, indeed. This is compounded by the fact that this particular qualifier is specific to ELisp (the more usual qualifiers are `:after`, `:before`, and `:around`). Stefan