From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Request to add Package to GNU ELPA Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2023 11:39:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87tty24ap2.fsf@bernoul.li> <87wn2y5em5.fsf@posteo.net> <87r0t44zbx.fsf@bernoul.li> <87sfde7lh4.fsf@posteo.net> <87lej6ju1m.fsf@bernoul.li> <875yaayyly.fsf@posteo.net> <87bkk2xcjz.fsf@posteo.net> <87pm8hf1z0.fsf@posteo.net> <87y1n417hl.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33171"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Jonas Bernoulli , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 07 17:40:35 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pkoCZ-0008QU-7y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 17:40:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pkoBv-0007JD-H9; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 11:39:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pkoBu-0007J2-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 11:39:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pkoBs-0006Hi-Bg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Apr 2023 11:39:53 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1DCAD442EA8; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 11:39:50 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EF885442EA5; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 11:39:48 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1680881989; bh=gY++02ucdZY7MODlM1rtCiKozYQCwOotQ7eoG5w/nk0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=n+xZQ1x/3AwflE28GigjSrqaZUwCsls28txjqAucDC5k0vFKJbwxtYVyramaYeQDA eb/znyA185xZpqywu4fMLM7ycAdGVyEf1557hhbfOmo+WZNVl++lTWsO5cCOrp+oSj qalfbxIRJ8DuocZD69FZMzK+4P5W7qEvz+GFgi7UutV+8CnnW6bvm9oOA1VxA9Rgb3 00gNnouSUqwNVIabHrfK155ipN4OOamlhRBre23HaJpaTLTu4YV2cIz0jf9wSUXa1K /X4SK6ksdUughqAwLiw2Zoh/Z/sXXuX3pBL/GD2j3bsjWLMXyEiz+bmQsloux7d268 jMy9mOLf5DHrg== Original-Received: from alfajor (bras-base-mtrlpq0774w-grc-03-70-30-234-143.dsl.bell.ca [70.30.234.143]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D44B71233BA; Fri, 7 Apr 2023 11:39:48 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87y1n417hl.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Fri, 07 Apr 2023 07:23:02 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:305161 Archived-At: >> [ I'm curious which definitions of `compat` this uses. ] > > Those should be > > - file-name-concat > - length> > - with-suppressed-warnings > - named-let > - length= > - ensure-list > - macroexp-file-name > - dlet Thanks. Nice. > Do you think it is worth mentioning them? No, I don't think so. The patch LGTM now, Stefan