From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [svenjoac@gmx.de: WoMan chokes on some manpages: Invalid search bound (wrong side of point)] Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:40:12 -0400 Message-ID: References: <85tzr9o896.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187322030 18198 80.91.229.12 (17 Aug 2007 03:40:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 03:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: svenjoac@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 17 05:40:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ILshG-0004MY-Vl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2007 05:40:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILshG-0002KL-IZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:40:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ILshC-0002IX-EF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:40:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ILshA-0002F3-JN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:40:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ILshA-0002Eq-Bs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:40:20 -0400 Original-Received: from tomts13.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.34] helo=tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ILsh3-0004HT-FI; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:40:13 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([70.53.193.20]) by tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20070817034012.GIRY13659.tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home>; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:40:12 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 729D27FCE; Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:40:12 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Thu\, 16 Aug 2007 20\:32\:25 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Detected-Kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76664 Archived-At: > [I sent this message a week ago but did not get a response.] > Shouldn't search-forward and re-search-forward in the case of a > backlaying limit and "no-error" set just quietly return? > I'd rather not open an issue like that just to fix a local bug. Would > someone please fix the bug by changing woman.el, then ack? It was in man (used by woman) and I fixed it a few days ago, Stefan