From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Issue from FOR-RELEASE resolved? Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:15:29 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203967005 30155 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2008 19:16:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 25 20:17:10 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JTioy-0000vy-ES for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 20:17:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTioS-0000bG-Jh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:16:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTioO-0000an-AS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:16:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JTioM-0000aC-Nx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:16:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JTioM-0000a9-L3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:16:26 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JTioI-00031o-TB; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:16:23 -0500 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (vpn-132-204-232-177.acd.umontreal.ca [132.204.232.177]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m1PJGSgE009234; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:16:29 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4D949B40C5; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:15:29 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:01:26 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered HAS_X_HELO=0 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90422 Archived-At: > ** Does deleting frames run Lisp code? If so, can we get rid of that? > It is a dangerous design. > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-09/msg01330.html > Haven't we fixed this not to run Lisp code > in the cases where that is dangerous? I believe we have, indeed, Stefan