From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Word search Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:47:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87myp99rd3.fsf@jurta.org> <87od9n36ew.fsf@jurta.org> <87d4q25w95.fsf_-_@jurta.org> <87skyyjjcb.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205261267 22872 80.91.229.12 (11 Mar 2008 18:47:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 18:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 11 19:48:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZ9WC-0001LS-78 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 19:48:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ9Vd-00062E-OV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:47:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ9VZ-00061N-Ea for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:47:29 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ9VY-000619-2r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:47:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZ9VX-000616-U3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mercure.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.24.67]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZ9VX-0001k2-ID for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:47:27 -0400 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B172CEA8F; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:47:26 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C9D3FE0; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:47:18 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1D75B6CAA2; Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:47:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87skyyjjcb.fsf@jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:38:12 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92177 Archived-At: > BTW, in bookmark.el I see: > ;; This C-u binding might not be very useful any more now that we > ;; provide access to the default via the standard M-n binding. > ;; Maybe we should just remove it? --Stef-08 > (define-key map "\C-u" 'bookmark-insert-current-bookmark) > I agree that this is unnecessary any more, and if no one will object, > maybe we could just remove it? Actually, I decided to leave it in, hence the comment. The reason why I decided to leave it in, is that some users may like to type something and then hit C-u which will *add* the default, whereas M-n will repalce what they typed with the default. Maybe I'm being overly cautious here and we can just throw away this binding, but I don't know enough how other people may use bookmarks to feel confident about it. Stefan PS: Oh and for your C-w, I personally think we should have a generic C-w binding in minibuffer-local-map.