From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lexbind Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:00:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ir02fqlw.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87ir02w0op.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <878x0xww47.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205521333 15010 80.91.229.12 (14 Mar 2008 19:02:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 19:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, Miles Bader To: "paul r" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 14 20:02:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JaFAp-0007WJ-SV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:02:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JaFAG-0000Z1-L0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:02:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JaFAD-0000Wn-32 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:01:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JaFAB-0000V3-Kj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:01:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JaFAB-0000V0-HF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:01:55 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JaFA4-0005z0-Dm; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:01:48 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAN5o2kdMCrZs/2dsb2JhbACqOIEI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,502,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="16067242" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2008 15:01:46 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([76.10.182.108]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id UWP53546; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:01:46 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 422B88F43; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 15:00:28 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (paul r.'s message of "Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:03:32 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92603 Archived-At: > At the end, what is the "officially recommended" way of defining a > local function ? > - (labels ...) , a macro coming from cl-macs ? > or - (let ((fct (lambda ...))) .) which is not a macro, but is > syntaxly less convenient to manipulate? > Thanks for your light. Either way is fine, Stefan