From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Usability suggestion : completion for M-: Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:28:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <003001c886f5$366f4330$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> <874pb7ikt7.fsf@jurta.org> <000501c8873d$4ff68550$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> <000701c88785$bd26dce0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> <87d4puxx2b.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205944136 21765 80.91.229.12 (19 Mar 2008 16:28:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:28:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bzg@altern.org, paul r , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 19 17:29:15 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jc1A8-0007p5-W1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:29:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jc19Y-0007a5-Nz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:28:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jc19P-0007XK-Aw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:28:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jc19O-0007Ww-5x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:28:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jc19N-0007Wq-Li for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:28:25 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jc19K-0004E8-53; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:28:22 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEAO7b4EdMCrTo/2dsb2JhbACqKIEH X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,525,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="16237622" Original-Received: from smtp.pppoe.ca ([65.39.196.238]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2008 12:28:21 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([76.10.180.232]) by smtp.pppoe.ca (Internet Mail Server v1.0) with ESMTP id ZTV64321; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:28:21 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4BA958168; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:28:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:10 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92986 Archived-At: > How necessary is it today to have *by default* C-i bound to TAB (and > C-m bound to RET). > I thin both indentation and completion are important enough to be on > TAB, not C-i. > In any case, we should not change such a thing without polling the users. Since under ttys, TAB and C-i are usually indistinguishable, I'd rather not being them to different commands, since that would only work on GUIs. Stefan