From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:20:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: <878wusz0v9.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87vdxp27z6.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87prnxe5hc.fsf@rattlesnake.com> <873aktck5d.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k5e5dsvq.fsf@rattlesnake.com> <48B44802.1080302@emf.net> <48B5D5EF.2030501@emf.net> <20080827220906.GB5374@muc.de> <48B5FB11.6090708@emf.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220293286 14815 80.91.229.12 (1 Sep 2008 18:21:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, Thomas Lord , bob@rattlesnake.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 01 20:22:20 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KaE2L-0005gq-Iy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:22:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52187 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KaE1M-0006KR-FB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:21:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KaE1H-0006K3-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:20:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KaE1F-0006Jr-PA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:20:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45579 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KaE1F-0006Jo-Jd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:20:53 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:8608 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KaE1B-0003lC-5q; Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:20:49 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMFAC/Pu0hFxJrH/2dsb2JhbACBZbFogWmBBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.32,309,1217822400"; d="scan'208";a="26192883" Original-Received: from 69-196-154-199.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.154.199]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2008 14:20:44 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0CA2789A0; Mon, 1 Sep 2008 14:20:44 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:11:27 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103379 Archived-At: > I don't think we would want to implement undo by making a snapshot, > even if the data makes snapshots possible, because this would take up > a lot more space than the current undo data. I don't think it would necessarily take up significantly more memory. In some cases it'll use up less memory. OTOH it might make it difficult to implement undo-elt-in-region. Stefan