From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Infrastructural complexity. Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:29:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20090712180623.GA1009@muc.de> <87skgwb9na.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ab34ti2o.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4A61D2A5.8080504@gmx.at> <87vdlpfun0.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4A62F79A.90001@gmx.at> <873a8s5wwm.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <873a8s2rqu.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4A6439B4.8010409@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248114588 9644 80.91.229.12 (20 Jul 2009 18:29:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , martin rudalics , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 20 20:29:40 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MSxcJ-0004IH-B3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:29:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35835 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MSxcI-0003zB-Ow for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:29:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MSxc3-0003vR-GV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:29:23 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MSxby-0003mP-CE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:29:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56120 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MSxby-0003lz-64 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:29:18 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:43401) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MSxbx-0006sN-QY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:29:17 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtIEAMNUZEpFpZqY/2dsb2JhbACBUM8thAwFhwI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,235,1246852800"; d="scan'208";a="41911738" Original-Received: from 69-165-154-152.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.154.152]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 20 Jul 2009 14:29:16 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8B1CA7F66; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:29:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:22:00 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112844 Archived-At: >>> BTW, do you now have a fix to the problem of breaking the 'window >>> property of overlays when restoring windows? [...] > I think it is better to think of them just as font-lock faces. We do > not save that, it is recreated autmoatically (if we recreate the > state). I'd tend to agree (at least it corresponds to the use of the `window' property in doc-view.el). Stefan