From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-23 release branch Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:23:46 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zl2g24xy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83d3zc2iqr.fsf@gnu.org> <87eijsoz6u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268249090 25452 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2010 19:24:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 10 20:24:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpRWD-00083v-3f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:24:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34055 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NpRW2-0001LW-Ic for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:24:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NpRVy-0001LJ-G9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:24:18 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52430 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NpRVv-0001Ky-0o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:24:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpRVs-0007Wo-Gg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:24:12 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:10311 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpRVU-0007T2-8a; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:23:48 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAGOAl0tLd+qv/2dsb2JhbACaU3S8QIR5BIMXh3Q X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,615,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="57948776" Original-Received: from 75-119-234-175.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.234.175]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2010 14:23:46 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id A29CD81B0; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:23:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87eijsoz6u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:37:29 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.93 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121784 Archived-At: > Wouldn't it make more sense to push your local bidi branch as a branch > first? One of us is missing something: sftp://bzr.sv.gnu.org/srv/bzr/emacs/emacs-bidi has been around for a while now. Stefan