From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: completion-cycle-threshold and a suggestion Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 08:59:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274533190 11343 80.91.229.12 (22 May 2010 12:59:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 12:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 22 14:59:46 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFoIr-00019A-RN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 14:59:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40449 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFoIr-0007jt-8b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 08:59:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35820 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFoIl-0007iM-Ho for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 08:59:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFoIk-0000vE-AT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 08:59:39 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:61990 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFoIj-0000v0-1x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 08:59:38 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAPJx90tFpZJF/2dsb2JhbACeEXK9AoUTBIw/ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,283,1272859200"; d="scan'208";a="64809681" Original-Received: from 69-165-146-69.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.146.69]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 22 May 2010 08:59:36 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id E6E2F81C2; Sat, 22 May 2010 08:59:35 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Sat, 22 May 2010 02:34:43 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125061 Archived-At: >> So are you saying that in your experience, the heuristic gives bad >> results, or that the heuristic somehow was not applied? > Seems so. Which is it? - the heuristic gives bad results? - the heuristic somehow was not applied? Stefan