From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:18:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3pwt759.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <871v6cjagz.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290529262 9841 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2010 16:21:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sean Sieger Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 23 17:20:58 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKvc1-0007sS-2b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:20:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56928 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKvc0-000796-Fa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:20:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37755 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKvb3-00060U-AD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:20:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKva2-0005G9-Nm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:19:41 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:10918 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKva2-0005Fu-Ko for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:18:54 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhMJALp460xFxKB0/2dsb2JhbAChaX1yviGFSwSEWo1q X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,242,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="83335943" Original-Received: from 69-196-160-116.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.196.160.116]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 23 Nov 2010 11:18:52 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 90941660BB; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:18:52 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <871v6cjagz.fsf@gmail.com> (Sean Sieger's message of "Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:01:00 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133059 Archived-At: > I guess no debug info has been included (probably not a good idea for > snapshots). > My bad: > - Snapshots should or should not include debug info? > - Pretests should or should not include debug info? These two should have debug info, yes. They're mostly distributed to help people fix bugs before the release. > - Releases should or should not include debug info? I'm OK either way on this one. Stefan