From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r102688: Minor clean up to silence some gcc warnings. Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:04:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k4j6t2fm.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> <87fwts3m6q.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292853879 4092 80.91.229.12 (20 Dec 2010 14:04:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:04:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , romain@orebokech.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 20 15:04:35 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PUgLr-0001JD-3E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:04:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53987 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PUgLq-0003JH-LA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:04:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38198 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PUgLk-0003El-5Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:04:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PUgLj-00068j-6E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:04:27 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:11167 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PUgLh-00068H-Sr; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:04:25 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAB/xDk1Ld/KP/2dsb2JhbACkInS9YoVKBIRljhI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,202,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="85931705" Original-Received: from 75-119-242-143.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.242.143]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 20 Dec 2010 09:04:24 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3D55D58E6D; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:04:24 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87fwts3m6q.fsf@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?B?IsWgdMSbcMOhbiBOxJtt?= =?utf-8?B?ZWMiJ3M=?= message of "Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:03:57 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133837 Archived-At: > ...which is precisely the point being made -- if you committed ChangeLog > cleanups separately, it would be much easier to never look at them. Quite the contrary: they'd even get their own revision-id. > Not mentioning bisecting, reverting and all the usual (D)VCS best > practices... I fail to see the relationship between ChangeLog changes and bisecting. In any case, the way forward is to stop using ChangeLog files. Stefan