From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pop-to-buffer-same-window Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:50:21 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871uw05jfk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871uvzdnpr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1314975034 6369 80.91.229.12 (2 Sep 2011 14:50:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 14:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 02 16:50:28 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QzV4d-0002ec-40 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 16:50:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56771 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzV4c-0004Pd-Hr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:50:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56700) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzV4a-0004Oy-Iy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:50:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzV4Z-0000aS-Gb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:50:24 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:33306) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QzV4Z-0000aN-Dm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:50:23 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p82EoMsS002218; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:50:22 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id EFA6A13041B; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:50:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871uvzdnpr.fsf@stupidchicken.com> (Chong Yidong's message of "Fri, 02 Sep 2011 10:26:56 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV3968=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <3968> : streams <677661> : uri <949879> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143720 Archived-At: >> This said, with the new switch-to-buffer's FORCE-SAME-WINDOW, we don't >> need pop-to-buffer-same-window since switch-to-buffer works just as well. > This means we should switch all the pop-to-buffer-same-window calls back > to switch-to-buffer. Any objections? No. Stefan